СYBERCRIME AS A TRANSNATIONAL PHENOMENON: CRIMINOLOGICAL DETERMINANTS AND INTERNATIONAL LEGAL MECHANISMS FOR COUNTERING IT IN UKRAINE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/klj-2026-9.16

Keywords:

cybercrime, transnational crime, criminological determinants of combating cybercrime, international legal mechanisms for combating cybercrime, digital evidence, the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime, technical support and professional training in the field of cybersecurity

Abstract

The article argues that the transnational nature of cybercrime necessitates a comprehensive integration of criminological and international legal approaches, both in its academic analysis and in practical countermeasures. The key determinants of this phenomenon in the context of digitalisation are analysed, in particular socio-economic, technological and regulatory factors. Particular emphasis is placed on international legal instruments for combating cybercrime and the specifics of their implementation in Ukraine. The provisions of the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime are examined, and the role of international organisations in this field is outlined. Directions for improving the national mechanism for preventing and combating cybercrime are proposed. It is argued that international legal instruments, in particular the provisions of the Budapest Convention, are of decisive importance for the formation of an effective system to counter cybercrime, as they contribute to the harmonisation of the criminalisation of relevant acts, regulate procedures for the collection of digital evidence, and strengthen international cooperation. The paper emphasises the desirability of more actively incorporating international standards into national criminal policy, as well as adapting mechanisms for international cooperation to the conditions of hybrid threats. It has been demonstrated that cybercrime can only be effectively combated through a systematic approach that combines national and international efforts, the use of modern technological solutions, and strict adherence to human rights standards. It is precisely this approach that ensures an adequate level of security in the digital environment and guarantees the protection of individual rights and freedoms. The conclusions emphasise that Ukraine’s priority tasks remain the further implementation of international standards, the modernisation of national legislation, and the improvement of the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies. It is also important to strengthen institutional capacity, develop technical capabilities, and improve the professional training of specialists in the field of cybersecurity. Future research should focus on analysing specific forms of cybercrime (in particular ransomware, phishing and cyber espionage), as well as on developing criminological models for forecasting and assessing risks in the digital environment.

References

Бондаренко І. Д. Концепт «втрати функціональності» в контексті визнання кібератак воєнним злочином. Юридичний науковий електронний журнал. 2024. № 10. С. 500–503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2024-10/115

Карвацька С. Б., Маник А. З., Строїч М. І. Кібербезпека: сучасні виклики та міжнародно-правові рамки щодо захисту даних. Науковий вісник Ужгородського національного університету. Серія: Право. 2025. Вип. 87, ч. 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2025.87.4.39

Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime, concerning the criminalisation of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer systems : Protocol of the Council of Europe (28.01.2003). URL: https://ccdcoe.org/uploads/2018/11/CoE-030128-AdditionalProtocol-1.pdf (дата звернення: 01.04.2026).

Comprehensive study on cybercrime / United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. 2013. URL: https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/organized-crime/comprehensive-study-on-cybercrime.html (дата звернення: 01.04.2026).

Internet Organised Crime Threat Assessment (IOCTA) 2024 / Europol. 2024. URL: https://www.europol.europa.eu/publication-events/main-reports/internet-organised-crime-threatassessment-iocta-2024 (дата звернення: 01.04.2026).

Convention on Cybercrime : Convention of the Council of Europe від 23 листоп. 2001 р. URL: https://www.coe.int/en/web/cybercrime/the-budapest-convention (дата звернення: 01.04.2026).

Думчиков М. О. Криміналістична типологізація кримінальних правопорушень у кіберпросторі. Аналітично-порівняльне правознавство. 2023. № 2. С. 287–290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.02.49

Діденко О. В. Цифрова криміналістика та міжнародна протидія кіберзлочинності (на прикладі електронної торгівлі). Аналітично-порівняльне правознавство. 2025. № 4 (3). С. 184–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2025.04.3.26

Кримінальний кодекс України : Закон України від 5 квіт. 2001 р. № 2341-III. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14#Text (дата звернення: 01.04.2026).

Про основні засади забезпечення кібербезпеки України : Закон України від 5 жовт. 2017 р. № 2163-VIII. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2163-19#Text и(дата звернення: 01.04.2026).

Global cybercrime strategy 2022–2025 / INTERPOL. 2022. URL: https://www.interpol.int/content/download/19846/file/Cybercrime%20Global%20Strategy_EN.pdf (дата звернення: 01.04.2026).

Benedik v. Slovenia (Application no. 62357/14): judgment of the European Court of Human Rights від 24 Apr. 2018. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=002-11930 (дата звернення: 01.04.2026).

Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (Applications nos. 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15): judgment of the European Court of Human Rights від 25 May 2021. URL: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-140713%22]} (дата звернення: 01.04.2026).

Published

2026-05-20

Issue

Section

INTERNATIONAL LAW AND COMPARATIVE LAW