LEGAL REGULATION OF PATENT LINKAGE IN PHARMACEUTICALS: ЕXPERIENCE FROM FOREIGN COUNTRIES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/klj-2024-5.12

Keywords:

patent linkage, pharmaceuticals, patent disputes, generics, intellectual property

Abstract

The article is dedicated to exploring the nuances of legal regulation concerning "patent linkage" in pharmaceuticals in foreign countries, focusing on its impact on competition, access to medicines, and intellectual property rights infringement. The research methodology employed includes general scientific and specific approaches to scientific cognition: dialectical method, formal-logical method, systemic-structural method, and comparative legal method. These approaches facilitated the clarification of the legal aspects of regulating the "patent linkage" system. The mechanisms of legal regulation of patent linkage in various countries, including France, Germany, Hong Kong, and Japan, are examined. In France and Hong Kong, patent linkage is not legislatively enforced, allowing generics to market drugs even before the expiration of patent rights. However, this may lead to legal disputes and significant risks for generics in case of subsequent patent conflicts. In Germany, as in other EU member states, the establishment of the Unified Patent Court aims to facilitate effective resolution of patent disputes and reduce legal risks for all parties involved. It is noted that patent linkage, which permits generics to market drugs before patent expiry without infringement, is actively criticized due to the absence of legislative regulation, potentially leading to artificial extension of patent rights and fostering unfair competition. The article discusses judicial practices concerning patent disputes, which play a pivotal role in shaping the competitive environment in the pharmaceutical sector. Key issues related to unfair mechanisms, such as the creation of "patent thickets" aimed at avoiding competition and delaying the market entry of generics, are identified. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of refining the regulatory environment to promote access to innovative medical technologies and reduce legal uncertainties arising from patent linkage.

References

Mercurio B. Drugs, Patents and Policy: A Contextual Study of Hong Kong. Cambridge University Press, 2018. 242 рр.

Hatch-Waxman Letters. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. URL: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/abbreviated-new-drug-application-anda/hatch-waxman-letters (date of access: 01.05.2024).

Волинець І. П. Захист прав інтелектуальної власності від недобросовісної конкуренції на ринку лікарських засобів : дис. ... д-ра філософії в галузі права : 081. Київ, 2021. 279 с.

Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Approved_Drug_Products_with_Therapeutic_Equivalence_Evaluations (date of access: 01.05.2024).

Senate Bill Encourage Generic Drug Market. The Pharmacy Blog. URL: https://www.thepharmacyblog.com/senate-bill-encourage-generic-drug-market/ (date of access: 01.05.2024).

Bullen S., Taylor S. Reform of Patent Linkage in Italy: has anything really changed?. Lexology. URL: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=dbc047d1-b1e5-4dc6-8e47-c062a1c69398(date of access: 01.05.2024).

Okada A. Pharmaceutical Intellectual Property and Competition Law Review. Third Edition, 2022. Law Business Research Ltd. Р. 60–69.

Kasai Y., Wakabayashi J. Pharmaceutical Intellectual Property and Competition Law Review. Fourth Edition, 2023. Law Business Research Ltd. Р. 89–101.

Pochart F. Pharmaceutical Intellectual Property and Competition Law Review, 2020. Law Business Research Ltd. Р. 59–69.

Weber C., Pesch B. Pharmaceutical Intellectual Property and Competition Law Review. Fourth Edition, 2023. Law Business Research Ltd. Р. 63–76.

Волинець І.П. Взаємозв’язок між концепцією сталого розвитку, недобросовісною конкуренцією та захистом інтелектуальної власності: виклики та можливості. Створення, охорона, захист і комерціалізація об'єктів права інтелектуальної власності: матеріали VІІ Всеукраїнської науково-практичної конференції з міжнародною участю, (26.05.2024, м. Київ): ел. збірник / Упоряд.: Ю.М. Перга., О.М. Боярчук. Київ: КПІ ім. Ігоря Сікорського, 2024. 343 с.

Патентна ув’язка в Україні служить єдиній цілі – штучному продовженню патентної монополії фармкомпаній. PRAVO.UA. URL: https://pravo.ua/patentna-uv-iazka-v-ukrainisluzhyt-iedynii-tsili-shtuchne-prodovzhennia-patentnoi-monopolii-farmkompanii/(дата звернення: 16.03.2024).

Patent Linkage System for Intellectual Property Rights and Public Health Harmonisation. APEC Intellectual Property Rights Experts Group, 2023. 158 рр. URL: https://www.apec.org/docs/default-source/publications/2023/7/223_ipeg_patent-linkage-system-for-intellectual-propertyrights-and-public-health-harmonisation.pdf?sfvrsn=bc4d2712_2(date of access: 01.05.2024).

Published

2024-07-24

Issue

Section

CIVIL AND ECONOMIC LAW AND PROCESS